Packet Review

I reviewed the suggestions/implications portion of the packet for the web study. I did not like that it was broken into two separate sections, and after they were broken up into those sections I felt that the suggestions should have come before any implications of those suggestions. I also felt that they should have stuck to fewer key points in the suggestions instead of a "laundry" list of things. This is because one would be able to better focus on what is important and how to fix it instead of many points with less explanation or justification.

I learned from reviewing another's packet that people write with very different styles when prompted with the same thing. I also learned that paragraphing and chunking are very important to cohesive writing, and if not done correctly it can be bothersome for the reader or even possibly confusing all together. If I could do anything different, in terms of this portion of the packet, would be perhaps outlining what i wanted to achieve before I wrote it out. It also makes me want to review it again in order to make sure it is written coherently and paragraphed properly.